Current:Home > reviewsA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -TradeWise
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
Surpassing View
Date:2025-04-10 13:59:43
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (318)
Related
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- A school bus is set on fire with kids inside. An ex-Utah bus driver is now being charged.
- Michelle Williams from Destiny's Child jokes 'no one recognizes me' in new Uber One ad
- EAGLEEYE COIN: Privacy Coin: A Digital Currency to Protect Personal Privacy
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- University of Arizona president to get a 10% pay cut after school’s $177M budget shortfall
- Liberty University will pay $14 million fine for student safety violations
- Sister Wives' Garrison Brown Welcomed New Addition Days Before His Death
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Sydney Sweeney Proves Her Fashion Rules Are Unwritten With Hair Transformation and Underwear Look
Ranking
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Man freed from prison after 34 years after judge vacates conviction in 1990 murder
- Texas fire chief who spent 9 days fighting historic wildfires dies responding to early morning structure fire
- Michael Strahan’s Daughter Isabella Undergoes Emergency Surgery After Hospitalization Amid Cancer Battle
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- 16 and Pregnant Star Sean Garinger’s Ex Selena Gutierrez Speaks Out on His Death
- Under $50 Decoration Tips for a Small Bedroom
- Dakota Johnson talks 'Madame Web' reviews and being a stepmom to Gwyneth Paltrow's kids
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
John Mulaney's Ex-Wife Anna Marie Tendler to Detail Endless Source of My Heartbreak in New Memoir
CFPB caps credit card late fees under new Biden admin rule. How low will they go?
Lab leader pleads no contest to manslaughter in 2012 Michigan meningitis deaths
Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
Thieves using cellular and Wi-Fi jammers to enter homes for robbery
Wisconsin appeals court says regulators must develop PFAS restrictions before mandating clean-up
Thieves using cellular and Wi-Fi jammers to enter homes for robbery